Showing posts with label D-League. Show all posts
Showing posts with label D-League. Show all posts

Monday, October 13, 2014

Kevin Durant and Mark Cuban Verbally Spar Regarding Max Contracts & Guarantees

We’re less than a week from the announcement of the new media deal and discussions about the new Collective Bargaining Agreement ("CBA") are out in mass.  We've already heard from the movers and shakers such as Mark Cuban, LeBron and Kevin Durant regarding restructuring maximum deals and the possibility of removing guaranteed contracts.

After LeBron and Kevin Durant publicly lobbied the owners to remove maximum salaries; Cuban responded with the following:

Mark Cuban
“If you give up guarantees, [i]t’s a trade-off….”

“It was discussed during the lockout time among owners, but never got anywhere. So it was just one of those trial balloons. I’m not offering this as a negotiation, I’m not suggesting it, all I’m saying is that was something we discussed before, and max contracts are always big question, guarantees are always a big question. But we have two years before that’s even an issue, so no point discussing it now.”


These contrasting viewpoints have polarized much of the NBA fan base; and as such I thought I could shed a little light on the issues being discussed:

Maximum Deals.  As a direct result of explosion of contracts given to star athletes which occurred during the mid-to-late 90’s; one of the owner’s biggest wins during the lockout of 1999 was the imposition of maximum contracts.  Fresh off the megadeals signed by Shaquille O’Neal (signed seven-year, $121 million contract in 1996) and Kevin Garnett (in 1998 signed six-years, $126 million while only 21 years old) the owner’s had a legitimate reason to fear the increasing costs of superstars. 

Additionally the owners had an unlikely ally here as they had the support of the vast majority of the players in the union.  These players realized that the star’s salary being capped leaves more money available for the rest of the players on the team; and because these players represent the lion’s share of the union this alliance was enough to approve the inclusion of max deals.

While I am optimistic that the value of max deals will increase substantially; I doubt the influx of money will be enough to defeat those two powerful forces and totally remove max deals.

Guaranteed Contracts.  While most of us know that the bulk of NBA contracts are fully guaranteed; most of us do not seem to know why, mistakenly believing that the basis of the guarantee lies with the CBA. 

The truth is the only NBA contracts mandated by the CBA to be guaranteed are those belonging to 1st round picks on their rookie deals. Any other guaranteed contract was the result of the negotiations as they exist in the current market not the CBA.

Therefore any changes in the structure of contracts would be the result of a change in the market and not the CBA.


So while it was interesting to hear these powerful voices make their stances known regarding labor issues; I am not optimistic that this will result in any changes. 

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

NBA, I Salute You

Congratulations NBA.  In just 3 short years; the league has gone from being perceived as full of “thugs” and hemorrhaging money to having its future interests firmly secured by totally restructuring their image and taking progressive financial steps to secure a massive influx of revenue.

Image.  While no one is ready to claim that the NBA is ready to rival the NFL, the fact that ESPN/ABC and Turner sports are willing to triple the media deal with the NBA proves just how desirable the league currently is.  Players like LeBron James, Kobe Bryant, Kevin Durant, Carmelo Anthony, Dwight Howard, Blake Griffin, and Chris Paul are among the most recognizable faces in sports. Don’t believe it?  Try to tune in to an hour of TV without seeing one of their commercials.   

While it can be argued that much of this is due to those respective stars and not the league, the league’s contribution cannot be denied.  The NBA’s implementation of the dress code, exile of Donald Sterling and willingness to embrace ideas other leagues have been historically tone-deal to (i.e. gambling), that have made it easier for the casual fan to accept the product. 

Influx of Revenue.  Beyond the revenue being produced by the new TV deal; the NBA has taken several steps to make the NBA a more financially healthy league.  The first and likely most significant was the CBA of 2011 which not only increased the money that the owners are entitled but also strengthened revenue sharing among the teams to ensure that cash-strapped teams have an additional stream of cash.


While the effects of the mega media deal on the CBA, salary cap, etc. are yet to be determined; the most significant development of this new deal is how expertly the NBA has navigated the tumultuous waters that permeated the league after the ugly labor battle. 

Monday, June 20, 2011

Revamping the NBA’s D-League

 By Kevin L. Davis (@EsquireSports)

The 10 year old NBA D-League model was one of the best ideas of David Stern’s reign as commissioner, but I think even he would agree that the system could use some improvement. With the CBA set to expire this summer, what better time is there to explore totally revamping the system? 

First off let’s explore the existing system. Players are signed by the league itself and then distributed to the individual teams, there are only 16 NBA D-League teams whereas there are 30 NBA teams (which means most D-League teams are affiliated with 2 rival NBA teams), and the rules currently limit NBA to assigning 2 players to the D-League and those players may only be rookies or 2nd year guys. There are not optimal conditions to most effectively develop NBA talent.

With collective bargaining sessions beginning between the owners and players I have included a few suggestions that could improve the quality of the D-League system. While they may seem radical at first, if instituted they could substantially boost league’s effectiveness in developing future NBA talent. While the owners would have to be convinced that scrapping a system of sharing D-League affiliates since it cuts down on expenses, the increase in availability of inexpensive talent should be worth it. I also belief if properly marketed the league could offset much of the increase in expenses. I truly belief there is a sustainable market of die-hard NBA fans who would watch these games if properly marketed. Since these teams are stationed in smaller markets I would strive to create a fan-centric family experience that can be fun for the whole family and start these games earlier in the day at 5 or 6 PM as opposed to 7 or 8 or later like NBA games. 

The players would also have to be convinced to approve this system as many view being demoted to the D-League as an insult and would hate that my proposal eliminates the current system which only allows 1st and 2nd year players to be forced down. However that has to be at least partly offset by the fact that this proposal would create 14 new D-League teams and therefore 168 new jobs (and if I’m correct in forecasting the market that this D-League could have those slots could pay substantially more than the D-League currently pays). Not to mention these new teams would offer an increased potential for coaching jobs or other slots in developmental positions for players in their post-playing days.

With the arguments to lobby both the owners and the NBA Players Association out of the way, let’s explore the actual proposal. First off, as stated earlier every team should be mandated to have there own D-League affiliate. Instead of signing with the league itself, each team should be responsible for hiring its own squad on its D-League team, expanding each NBA team's roster from 15 to 27 (15 NBA contracts and 12 D-League spots). Players would still be available by the draft or to be signed from leagues throughout the world, but I’d totally revamp the drafting process to accommodate the growth. I propose eliminating the D-League draft and expanding the NBA draft to at least 5 rounds. 

As earlier stated I also believe the limitation of only allowing demotion of players with less than 2 years of NBA experience should be scrapped. The only question is where should the magical boundary line be placed? I think everyone will agree that when players are eligible to be drafted at 19 years old, it is very foreseeable that some guys may need long-term development. Since the current system calls for 2 years after a player joins the league, and a player who exhausts his entire college eligibility would normally be 22 years old I propose a rule where any player under 24 years old (2 years over 22) could be able to sent down to the D-League without gaining his consent. Veterans (24 years old or older) signed to NBA contracts could only be demoted to the D-League if the team has gained his consent. This allows true long-term development, while having the added benefit of allowing NBA teams to use their D-League team for rehabilitation.

These changes would usher in an era of true development for NBA teams.